![quantum mechanics - A derivation of the canonical commutation relations (CCR) written by Dirac? - Physics Stack Exchange quantum mechanics - A derivation of the canonical commutation relations (CCR) written by Dirac? - Physics Stack Exchange](https://i.stack.imgur.com/urh9y.jpg)
quantum mechanics - A derivation of the canonical commutation relations (CCR) written by Dirac? - Physics Stack Exchange
![Table 1 from Classical Systems and Representations of (2+1) Newton-Hooke Symmetries | Semantic Scholar Table 1 from Classical Systems and Representations of (2+1) Newton-Hooke Symmetries | Semantic Scholar](https://d3i71xaburhd42.cloudfront.net/cf7dc1b88e6c07d98bc484457d47294c7b09d802/22-Table1-1.png)
Table 1 from Classical Systems and Representations of (2+1) Newton-Hooke Symmetries | Semantic Scholar
![SOLVED: Calculate the following commutation relations a) [H,x] b) [H, p], p is momentum operator c) [x, P], P is parity operator d) [p, P] SOLVED: Calculate the following commutation relations a) [H,x] b) [H, p], p is momentum operator c) [x, P], P is parity operator d) [p, P]](https://cdn.numerade.com/ask_images/358345c121064177b2094e13337e2190.jpg)
SOLVED: Calculate the following commutation relations a) [H,x] b) [H, p], p is momentum operator c) [x, P], P is parity operator d) [p, P]
![complex analysis - Trouble Deriving the Canonical Commutation Relation from the Product Rule - Mathematics Stack Exchange complex analysis - Trouble Deriving the Canonical Commutation Relation from the Product Rule - Mathematics Stack Exchange](https://i.stack.imgur.com/lM2Nl.png)
complex analysis - Trouble Deriving the Canonical Commutation Relation from the Product Rule - Mathematics Stack Exchange
![SOLVED: #Problem 4.20 (a) Starting with the canonical commutation relations for position and momentum Equation 4.10, work out the following commutators: [Lg,x] =ihy; [Lz,y] =-ihx [Lz, 2] =0 [4.122, (Lz p | = SOLVED: #Problem 4.20 (a) Starting with the canonical commutation relations for position and momentum Equation 4.10, work out the following commutators: [Lg,x] =ihy; [Lz,y] =-ihx [Lz, 2] =0 [4.122, (Lz p | =](https://cdn.numerade.com/ask_images/f56db407991549709130ad726b31d3e0.jpg)